There come a few times when studying language when you run across something too bizarrely counterintuitive to dream up - to me, vocalic harmony falls squarely in that category. If I didn't know it existed, I'd probably consider it impossible, but there it is, sitting squarely in the middle of Turkish, Igbo, Finnish, and even some dialects of Spanish. But what exactly is it?
Showing posts with label phonology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label phonology. Show all posts
Sunday, December 25, 2016
Sunday, December 11, 2016
ConLing - Why are so many Chinese logograms pronounced the same?
Anyone who's had any exposure to written Chinese has noticed how many characters have exactly the same pronunciation, or even heard the commonly thrown-around factoid that Chinese is full of homophones. Whether or not modern spoken Chinese languages are actually so unusually full of homophones is debatable, but it's certainly true that a huge number of Chinese characters are homophonic. For instance, the MDGB dictionary lists over a hundred characters with the pronunciation yì [î]. So why on earth is Chinese writing carrying so much information that has nothing to do with encoding the spoken language? It turns out that it can all be traced back to factors emerging from the history and nature of the writing system itself.
There's an interesting conception I encounter a lot among speakers of Mandarin - that historic writers like Laozi and Li Bai pronounced their characters identically to modern Beijing Mandarin, with all other dialects and variations descended from this timeless, standard pronunciation. Of course, this is patently false.
| Evolution of a pictographic character meaning "sun" |
There's an interesting conception I encounter a lot among speakers of Mandarin - that historic writers like Laozi and Li Bai pronounced their characters identically to modern Beijing Mandarin, with all other dialects and variations descended from this timeless, standard pronunciation. Of course, this is patently false.
Sunday, December 4, 2016
ConLing - How does allophony work?
Those of us who construct languages have probably seen it before - someone new to the art posts up their newly created phonology to reddit or a bulletin board, and... it's a list. If you hop on Wikipedia or read an academic description of a natural language page down to the section on phonology, it's typically a little bit longer. What gives?
If you're reading the phonology section of the Wikipedia article on Greenlandic, it starts with some lists - vowels, consonants, syllable shapes - but then it starts in on several paragraphs full of rules and sound changes. This is what was missing from the forum post! But maybe new makers of languages are just visible examples of a certain conception we have about the way we speak. It's easy to notice the fact that languages all contain distinct "sounds" (which is to say, phones), but words of course aren't just lawless noise sequences. In early infancy, the rules our mother tongue applies to our native language is irreversibly wired into our brain, so anyone can be forgiven for being blind to them, but the truth is that every word in every language has been run through a phonological filter - allophony.
If you're reading the phonology section of the Wikipedia article on Greenlandic, it starts with some lists - vowels, consonants, syllable shapes - but then it starts in on several paragraphs full of rules and sound changes. This is what was missing from the forum post! But maybe new makers of languages are just visible examples of a certain conception we have about the way we speak. It's easy to notice the fact that languages all contain distinct "sounds" (which is to say, phones), but words of course aren't just lawless noise sequences. In early infancy, the rules our mother tongue applies to our native language is irreversibly wired into our brain, so anyone can be forgiven for being blind to them, but the truth is that every word in every language has been run through a phonological filter - allophony.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
